Clasificación MLS 2026
Tras la jornada 31 · Proyección a partir de 2,000 simulaciones · actualizada el 26 oct, 11:50
| # | Equipo | PJ | DG | Pts | Forma | Pts proy. | Título | Top 4 | Descenso |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nashville SC | 31 | +43 | 70 | WDWWW | 125 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 1 |  Vancouver Whitecaps | 31 | +31 | 55 | LWDDL | 102 | 0% | 81% | 0% |
| 2 |  New England Revolution | 31 | +9 | 55 | WWWLL | 99 | 0% | 60% | 0% |
| 2 |  FC Dallas | 31 | +11 | 54 | WDWLW | 98 | 0% | 48% | 0% |
| 3 |  Inter Miami | 31 | +20 | 55 | LWWWL | 101 | 0% | 73% | 0% |
| 3 |  St. Louis City | 31 | +12 | 51 | LLDWW | 94 | 0% | 17% | 0% |
| 4 |  Chicago Fire | 31 | +9 | 51 | WLLWW | 93 | 0% | 15% | 0% |
| 4 |  San Jose Earthquakes | 31 | +7 | 48 | LDDDW | 89 | 0% | 2% | 0% |
| 5 |  Houston Dynamo | 31 | +2 | 48 | DDDDL | 88 | 0% | 2% | 0% |
| 5 |  Charlotte | 31 | +7 | 47 | LDLWL | 87 | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| 6 |  Los Angeles FC | 32 | +15 | 47 | DDWDL | 86 | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| 6 |  Philadelphia Union | 31 | +12 | 46 | LDWWW | 86 | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| 7 |  Seattle Sounders | 31 | +2 | 43 | DDLWW | 81 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |  Orlando City SC | 31 | -12 | 42 | DWDWL | 78 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |  Colorado Rapids | 31 | +1 | 42 | WDDDL | 79 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |  FC Cincinnati | 31 | -7 | 42 | WWLLW | 78 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |  Los Angeles Galaxy | 32 | -9 | 41 | DDWLW | 75 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |  New York Red Bulls | 31 | -15 | 39 | WLLWL | 73 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |  Real Salt Lake | 31 | 0 | 39 | WWDLW | 75 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |  Columbus Crew | 31 | +1 | 38 | WWWLW | 74 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |  Portland Timbers | 31 | -4 | 37 | WDLDL | 71 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 11 |  Toronto FC | 31 | -11 | 36 | LWDWL | 69 | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| 12 |  San Diego | 31 | -3 | 35 | DDDLD | 69 | 0% | 0% | 4% |
| 12 |  New York City FC | 31 | +2 | 35 | DDLLD | 69 | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| 13 |  Minnesota United FC | 31 | -8 | 35 | DWDDL | 68 | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| 13 |  DC United | 31 | -17 | 33 | LLLWL | 64 | 0% | 0% | 18% |
| 14 |  Austin | 31 | -17 | 34 | WLLLD | 66 | 0% | 0% | 12% |
| 14 |  Atlanta United FC | 31 | -15 | 30 | LLWLD | 60 | 0% | 0% | 58% |
| 15 |  CF Montreal | 31 | -26 | 25 | LDLLW | 52 | 0% | 0% | 98% |
| 15 |  Sporting Kansas City | 31 | -40 | 22 | LLLDL | 46 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Champions League (1–4) Europa / Conference (5–6) Descenso (28–30)Las probabilidades se recalculan tras cada resultado.
| # | Equipo | PJ | DG | Pts | Forma | Pts proy. | Título | Top 4 | Descenso |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nashville SC | 31 | +43 | 70 | WDWWW | 125 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| 2 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 31 | +31 | 55 | LWDDL | 102 | 0% | 81% | 0% |
| 3 | Inter Miami | 31 | +20 | 55 | LWWWL | 101 | 0% | 73% | 0% |
| 4 | New England Revolution | 31 | +9 | 55 | WWWLL | 99 | 0% | 60% | 0% |
| 5 | FC Dallas | 31 | +11 | 54 | WDWLW | 98 | 0% | 48% | 0% |
| 6 | St. Louis City | 31 | +12 | 51 | LLDWW | 94 | 0% | 17% | 0% |
| 7 | Chicago Fire | 31 | +9 | 51 | WLLWW | 93 | 0% | 15% | 0% |
| 8 | San Jose Earthquakes | 31 | +7 | 48 | LDDDW | 89 | 0% | 2% | 0% |
| 9 | Houston Dynamo | 31 | +2 | 48 | DDDDL | 88 | 0% | 2% | 0% |
| 10 | Charlotte | 31 | +7 | 47 | LDLWL | 87 | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| 11 | Los Angeles FC | 32 | +15 | 47 | DDWDL | 86 | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| 12 | Philadelphia Union | 31 | +12 | 46 | LDWWW | 86 | 0% | 1% | 0% |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | 31 | +2 | 43 | DDLWW | 81 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 | Colorado Rapids | 31 | +1 | 42 | WDDDL | 79 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 | Orlando City SC | 31 | -12 | 42 | DWDWL | 78 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | FC Cincinnati | 31 | -7 | 42 | WWLLW | 78 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 32 | -9 | 41 | DDWLW | 75 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | Real Salt Lake | 31 | 0 | 39 | WWDLW | 75 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 19 | Columbus Crew | 31 | +1 | 38 | WWWLW | 74 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20 | New York Red Bulls | 31 | -15 | 39 | WLLWL | 73 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 21 | Portland Timbers | 31 | -4 | 37 | WDLDL | 71 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 22 | Toronto FC | 31 | -11 | 36 | LWDWL | 69 | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| 23 | San Diego | 31 | -3 | 35 | DDDLD | 69 | 0% | 0% | 4% |
| 24 | New York City FC | 31 | +2 | 35 | DDLLD | 69 | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| 25 | Minnesota United FC | 31 | -8 | 35 | DWDDL | 68 | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| 26 | Austin | 31 | -17 | 34 | WLLLD | 66 | 0% | 0% | 12% |
| 27 | DC United | 31 | -17 | 33 | LLLWL | 64 | 0% | 0% | 18% |
| 28 | Atlanta United FC | 31 | -15 | 30 | LLWLD | 60 | 0% | 0% | 58% |
| 29 | CF Montreal | 31 | -26 | 25 | LDLLW | 52 | 0% | 0% | 98% |
| 30 | Sporting Kansas City | 31 | -40 | 22 | LLLDL | 46 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Champions League (1–4) Europa / Conference (5–6) Descenso (28–30)Las probabilidades se recalculan tras cada resultado.
Lucha por el título
100%Nashville SC
Vancouver Whitecaps 0% · Inter Miami 0% · resto 0%
Seguimiento del título →El partido clave del fin de semana
Nashville SC vs Philadelphia Union · jue, 01:30
Una victoria de Nashville SC sube sus opciones de título al 100%.
Pronóstico →Pronósticos de la jornada 32
14 partidos · 0 pronósticos gratis
Todos los partidos con 1X2, marcador y más/menos goles.
Pronósticos de la jornada 32Sobre la clasificación de MLS
¿Cómo se calcula la clasificación proyectada de MLS?
Simulamos los partidos restantes de MLS 2,000 veces con ratings de fuerza construidos a partir de resultados, diferencia de goles y forma, y promediamos dónde termina cada club.
¿Con qué frecuencia se actualiza?
La clasificación se actualiza tras cada partido y la proyección se recalcula en menos de una hora.
¿Quién gana MLS 2026?
Nashville SC es el favorito del modelo con un 100% ahora mismo, con Vancouver Whitecaps segundo con un 0%.