Clasificación MLS 2026
Tras la jornada 23 · Proyección a partir de 2,000 simulaciones · actualizada el 09 sept, 12:38
| # | Equipo | PJ | DG | Pts | Forma | Pts proy. | Título | Top 4 | Descenso |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nashville SC | 23 | +30 | 53 | DWWWW | 124 | 94% | 100% | 0% |
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 22 | +28 | 43 | LWWLW | 110 | 5% | 97% | 0% |
| 2 | Inter Miami | 23 | +15 | 43 | DWLDL | 104 | 1% | 81% | 0% |
| 2 | Houston Dynamo | 23 | +4 | 40 | DDLWW | 96 | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 3 | Chicago Fire | 22 | +11 | 38 | DDDWW | 97 | 0% | 41% | 0% |
| 3 | Los Angeles FC | 24 | +14 | 37 | DDDLL | 90 | 0% | 6% | 0% |
| 4 | FC Dallas | 23 | +5 | 37 | WDLWW | 91 | 0% | 11% | 0% |
| 4 | New England Revolution | 23 | +8 | 37 | LWDWL | 91 | 0% | 12% | 0% |
| 5 | St. Louis City | 23 | +5 | 37 | WDWDW | 91 | 0% | 9% | 0% |
| 5 | Charlotte | 23 | +8 | 36 | DWWDW | 89 | 0% | 6% | 0% |
| 6 | San Jose Earthquakes | 23 | +6 | 35 | DDLLL | 87 | 0% | 4% | 0% |
| 6 | FC Cincinnati | 22 | -2 | 31 | LDWDW | 81 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | 23 | 0 | 31 | LWLWW | 79 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 | New York City FC | 23 | +5 | 29 | DDDLL | 76 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | Portland Timbers | 23 | +1 | 31 | WLDWL | 79 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | Orlando City SC | 23 | -16 | 28 | WDWLD | 70 | 0% | 0% | 4% |
| 9 | San Diego | 23 | +6 | 30 | LWWLW | 78 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 | Philadelphia Union | 23 | -3 | 27 | WWDDW | 71 | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| 10 | Real Salt Lake | 22 | +1 | 29 | DLLLD | 78 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 10 | New York Red Bulls | 23 | -14 | 27 | DLDLL | 69 | 0% | 0% | 7% |
| 11 | Minnesota United FC | 23 | -3 | 29 | LDWLD | 75 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 11 | Toronto FC | 23 | -6 | 26 | DDWDW | 69 | 0% | 0% | 7% |
| 12 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 24 | -6 | 29 | WLDWL | 72 | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| 12 | DC United | 22 | -8 | 25 | DLLDD | 69 | 0% | 0% | 8% |
| 13 | Seattle Sounders | 22 | -5 | 27 | DDDLL | 73 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 13 | Columbus Crew | 23 | -5 | 23 | WLLLL | 64 | 0% | 0% | 27% |
| 14 | Austin | 23 | -13 | 25 | DWDWL | 65 | 0% | 0% | 17% |
| 14 | Atlanta United FC | 23 | -13 | 22 | DLWWW | 60 | 0% | 0% | 54% |
| 15 | CF Montreal | 23 | -18 | 21 | LLDWD | 58 | 0% | 0% | 68% |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | 23 | -35 | 15 | LLLDL | 45 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Champions League (1–4) Europa / Conference (5–6) Descenso (28–30)Las probabilidades se recalculan tras cada resultado.
| # | Equipo | PJ | DG | Pts | Forma | Pts proy. | Título | Top 4 | Descenso |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nashville SC | 23 | +30 | 53 | DWWWW | 124 | 94% | 100% | 0% |
| 2 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 22 | +28 | 43 | LWWLW | 110 | 5% | 97% | 0% |
| 3 | Inter Miami | 23 | +15 | 43 | DWLDL | 104 | 1% | 81% | 0% |
| 4 | Chicago Fire | 22 | +11 | 38 | DDDWW | 97 | 0% | 41% | 0% |
| 5 | Houston Dynamo | 23 | +4 | 40 | DDLWW | 96 | 0% | 33% | 0% |
| 6 | New England Revolution | 23 | +8 | 37 | LWDWL | 91 | 0% | 12% | 0% |
| 7 | FC Dallas | 23 | +5 | 37 | WDLWW | 91 | 0% | 11% | 0% |
| 8 | St. Louis City | 23 | +5 | 37 | WDWDW | 91 | 0% | 9% | 0% |
| 9 | Los Angeles FC | 24 | +14 | 37 | DDDLL | 90 | 0% | 6% | 0% |
| 10 | Charlotte | 23 | +8 | 36 | DWWDW | 89 | 0% | 6% | 0% |
| 11 | San Jose Earthquakes | 23 | +6 | 35 | DDLLL | 87 | 0% | 4% | 0% |
| 12 | FC Cincinnati | 22 | -2 | 31 | LDWDW | 81 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 | Colorado Rapids | 23 | 0 | 31 | LWLWW | 79 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 | Portland Timbers | 23 | +1 | 31 | WLDWL | 79 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 | San Diego | 23 | +6 | 30 | LWWLW | 78 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 | Real Salt Lake | 22 | +1 | 29 | DLLLD | 78 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 17 | New York City FC | 23 | +5 | 29 | DDDLL | 76 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 | Minnesota United FC | 23 | -3 | 29 | LDWLD | 75 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 19 | Seattle Sounders | 22 | -5 | 27 | DDDLL | 73 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 20 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 24 | -6 | 29 | WLDWL | 72 | 0% | 0% | 2% |
| 21 | Philadelphia Union | 23 | -3 | 27 | WWDDW | 71 | 0% | 0% | 3% |
| 22 | Orlando City SC | 23 | -16 | 28 | WDWLD | 70 | 0% | 0% | 4% |
| 23 | New York Red Bulls | 23 | -14 | 27 | DLDLL | 69 | 0% | 0% | 7% |
| 24 | Toronto FC | 23 | -6 | 26 | DDWDW | 69 | 0% | 0% | 7% |
| 25 | DC United | 22 | -8 | 25 | DLLDD | 69 | 0% | 0% | 8% |
| 26 | Austin | 23 | -13 | 25 | DWDWL | 65 | 0% | 0% | 17% |
| 27 | Columbus Crew | 23 | -5 | 23 | WLLLL | 64 | 0% | 0% | 27% |
| 28 | Atlanta United FC | 23 | -13 | 22 | DLWWW | 60 | 0% | 0% | 54% |
| 29 | CF Montreal | 23 | -18 | 21 | LLDWD | 58 | 0% | 0% | 68% |
| 30 | Sporting Kansas City | 23 | -35 | 15 | LLLDL | 45 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Champions League (1–4) Europa / Conference (5–6) Descenso (28–30)Las probabilidades se recalculan tras cada resultado.
Lucha por el título
94%Nashville SC
Vancouver Whitecaps 5% · Inter Miami 1% · resto 0%
Seguimiento del título →El partido clave del fin de semana
Toronto FC vs Nashville SC · jue, 01:30
Una victoria de Nashville SC sube sus opciones de título al 96%.
Pronóstico →Pronósticos de la jornada 7
15 partidos · 0 pronósticos gratis
Todos los partidos con 1X2, marcador y más/menos goles.
Pronósticos de la jornada 7Sobre la clasificación de MLS
¿Cómo se calcula la clasificación proyectada de MLS?
Simulamos los partidos restantes de MLS 2,000 veces con ratings de fuerza construidos a partir de resultados, diferencia de goles y forma, y promediamos dónde termina cada club.
¿Con qué frecuencia se actualiza?
La clasificación se actualiza tras cada partido y la proyección se recalcula en menos de una hora.
¿Quién gana MLS 2026?
Nashville SC es el favorito del modelo con un 94.4% ahora mismo, con Vancouver Whitecaps segundo con un 4.8%.





























